🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.