Fresh Start, Old Cautionary Tales: Lessons from Films Placed in 2026 Show Us?
The date 2025 might sound more futuristic. Perhaps it's the presence of the consonant "f" in "five". However 2026 signifies a leap forward, a moment where we currently stand, with every futuristic development – chiefly the broad integration of AI – appearing bleak, or possibly even worse. (It often seems like in a true dystopia, the mind-dulling corporate-sponsored anti-human technology might operate more effectively?) Didn't anyone warn us regarding this?
The response, at least regarding science fiction films made long ago (or occasionally recently) positioned in 2026, is a mixed bag. A number of these prophecies are universally relevant (worldwide disaster) but in detail far-fetched (if humanity is inevitably decimated, we will most likely take the primate species with us). Some of them are visionary; the rest just look like poor visual effects. But it's worth examining where various directors, ranging from masters to journeymen, believed we'd be situated by now in our planet's development. So let's examine at some of the films that have been set in 2026 throughout cinematic history and determine if they have anything to impart.
The Game 'Doom'
Well, this isn't promising. In the universe of the video game adaptation *Doom*, whose two-decade milestone was noted by hardly anyone, 2026 is the year that mankind discovers a gateway to an long-lost metropolis on Mars, where the inhabitants of Earth are able to set up a research facility. Now, the negative events – regarding plot and in terms of over-the-top film versions of a first-person-shooter video game – does not actually go down for two more decades later, so should we do discover a portal to Mars this year, we might have some time to avoid true disaster. Were we to uncover a passageway to an ancient Martian city, it's genuinely difficult to determine whether Elon Musk would still be extremely excited to send everyone to Mars or would instantly become disheartened that the portal was not a thing he personally paid for, allowing him to assert messianic ownership for mankind's journey to the cosmos. This precedes we even get to the harvesting of extraterrestrial genetics and resulting mutations into horrific creatures. (Again, this is closer to 2046, distinct from the Wong Kar-wai film.) Overall, *Doom* is (at the very least) a useful example for the reasons we let Mars serve as a stretch-goal hope for humanity. Be it in John Carpenter's chintzy space-western *Ghosts of Mars*, the more grounded science fiction of *Red Planet*, or the new-age mysticism of *Mission to Mars*, our far-off planet rarely serve as a beacon of optimism. Should someone wants to make that questionable red-planet property deal, maybe they ought to begin with first ensuring the fictional depiction appear appealing.
Marvel's Lesser Offerings
A of the strangest features of the present Marvel Cinematic Universe is the way it handles the multiple global disasters, encompassing a five-year time-jump whose events are largely undepicted in the movies themselves; the movies have become like a alarm clock constantly set a few minutes fast – only instead of minutes, it's annual increments. Consequently, there exists a large assortment of Marvel stuff that various wikis clarify to be taking place in 2026. The better entries, like *Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3* and the underappreciated adventure *The Marvels*, occur far away from Earth, and so seem quite detached from our sense of time. But the bad stuff is among the weakest Marvel has created: the nonsensically meandering TV show *Secret Invasion* and the remote-meeting debacle of *Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania*. Based on these examples, we're in for a great deal of annoying wheel-spinning in 2026, including the related narrative that actually, this nonsensical crap unfolding before our eyes is crucial to whatever happens next. More troublingly, in the actual world that assertion will probably prove accurate.
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
The majority of the original five-movie *Planet of the Apes* cycle is set in the more distant future of Earth, but the modern series that began with 2011’s *Rise of the Planet of the Apes* begins closer to home, starting its chronology approximately 2016. Thus, when a pathogen that knocks out the majority of Earth’s people has done its damage, and simultaneously boosted the cognitive abilities of primates, it’s only 2026, with further human indignities (and simian triumphs) ahead. The post-credits scene of *Rise*, depicting how swiftly this contagion spreads around the world and set around 2019, appears downright eerie in the wake of the real-world pandemic that would begin in 2020. By comparison, the movie *Dawn* seems less literal; if you can believe it, we’re already half a decade from the onset of Covid-19, and humanity, though clearly wounded by the still-spreading virus, was not wiped out, and technological infrastructure certainly has not been knocked out. Yet this most pessimistic of the quartet of modern *Apes* movies (at least so far!) still has a substantial bummer in store, suggesting that human and/or ape nature, whatever qualifies as each, will unavoidably result in warfare, no matter the work of the best-intentioned among us. We’re subject to the whims of those who exploit others’ baser impulses, even if those drives are not held by the majority. Right now, it feels difficult to argue with that, even though we probably should.
The Silent Classic
Easily the best-known depiction of 2026 in film is from a movie nearing celebrating its centennial. Fritz Lang’s iconic silent film *Metropolis* takes place in a city of tomorrow where rich businessmen preside over the skyscrapers as laborers toil below the surface on the machines that keep everything running. Rich city-dweller Freder, son of the city’s master, has his eyes opened to these enormous social gaps when he becomes obsessed with Maria, an subterranean organizer who preaches a reconciliation of the separate strata of Metropolis. A scientist with darker plans builds a automaton in her image, aiming to tear the whole of Metropolis down in flames. Here, a robot created to imitate a human does not serve as an instrument of the elite, but an entity who desires to witness their downfall; it's one element inverted by reality in a vision of tomorrow that otherwise seems to be progressing. *Metropolis* also envisions a world where technology depends on old-fashioned manual labor, which appears as a perfect fusion of rightwing contempt for “unskilled workers” and business zeal for an tech boom. It has not yet come to pass, but it's simple to picture a somewhat less stylish-looking iteration of Lang’s city expanding out with the promise of a resurgence to industrial production. The trickier, harder-to-imagine accomplishment is the ending of the film, where the chasm between the wealthy and the poor is bridged with love; not so much with concrete reforms. Like *Dawn of the Planet of the Apes*, the movie pleads for peaceful cohabitation; in contrast to *Dawn*, it appears optimistic about the possibility